IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojijes/v4y2021i1p42-52id3465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Agricultural Practices on Water Quality in River Basins in United States

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Harris

Abstract

Purpose: To aim of the study was to analyze the effects of agricultural practices on water quality in river basins in United States. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: Agricultural practices in the U.S., particularly fertilizer and pesticide use, significantly degrade water quality in river basins. Excessive nutrient runoff causes eutrophication, harmful algal blooms, and oxygen depletion, while pesticide use contaminates both surface and groundwater. Soil erosion and irrigation return flows further contribute to water quality issues by increasing sediment and nutrient pollution. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The theory of ecological modernization, the tragedy of the commons & the systems theory may be used to anchor future studies on the effects of agricultural practices on water quality in river basins in United States. Farmers should be encouraged to adopt best management practices (BMPs), such as reduced pesticide use, organic farming, and crop rotation, which have been shown to reduce agricultural runoff and improve water quality. Policies should be enacted or strengthened to regulate the use of fertilizers and pesticides, particularly in regions where intensive agriculture is prevalent.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Harris, 2021. "Effects of Agricultural Practices on Water Quality in River Basins in United States," International Journal of Environmental Sciences, IPRJB, vol. 4(1), pages 42-52.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijes:v:4:y:2021:i:1:p:42-52:id:3465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJES/article/view/3465
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijes:v:4:y:2021:i:1:p:42-52:id:3465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJES/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.