Author
Listed:
- Julius Thairu
- Dr. Michael Chirchir
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the implementation of the youth preference and reservations policy in public procurement. The research questions therefore were; to establish the extent to which the youth preference and reservations policy has been implemented and to establish the extent to which institutional challenges and legislation respectively affect implementation of the policy.Methodology: The study employed descriptive survey design and a census of all the 70 state owned enterprises headquartered in Nairobi was conducted in the study out of which 55 enterprises responded. The study used primary data which was collected through use of a five point likert scale questionnaire. The researcher used Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) to generate the descriptive statistics and also to generate inferential results. The descriptive statistics used included frequencies, averages and percentages while inferential statistics such as correlation analysis was used to demonstrate the extent to which legislation affects implementation of the youth preference and reservations policy in public procurement.Results: According to the research findings, the youth preference and reservations policy in public procurement had not been fully implemented. Effects of institutional challenges on implementation were found to be statistically significant with a negative impact on the implementation of the youth preference and reservations policy in public procurement. Results also indicate that legislation had negative but significant effect on implementation of the youth preference and reservations policy in public procurement.Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The study recommends that the government intensifies the awareness campaign among the procurement practitioners and budget holders on the policy; institutionalize monitoring and training in all the enterprises and include the practitioners in review of the Public Procurement legislation.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:oijscm:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:1-18:id:23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJSCM/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.