IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ogjppm/v3y2024i3p15-27id2951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-Procurement Systems and Organizational Performance in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Felix Weber

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the e-procurement systems and organizational performance in Germany. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The implementation of e-procurement has streamlined procurement processes, reducing costs and improving efficiency through automation and better supplier management. Organizations adopting e-procurement systems report enhanced transparency, reduced procurement cycle times, and improved compliance with procurement regulations. Additionally, the data-driven nature of e-procurement allows for better decision-making and strategic sourcing, contributing to overall organizational effectiveness and competitiveness in the market. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Technology acceptance model (TAM), resource-based view (RBV) & institutional theory may be used to anchor future studies on analyze the e-procurement systems and organizational performance in Germany. Establish regular and comprehensive training programs tailored to the needs of procurement staff to ensure effective utilization of e-procurement systems. Develop a national policy framework that encourages e-procurement adoption in both public and private sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Felix Weber, 2024. "E-Procurement Systems and Organizational Performance in Germany," Global Journal of Purchasing and Procurement Management, IPRJB, vol. 3(3), pages 15-27.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ogjppm:v:3:y:2024:i:3:p:15-27:id:2951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/GJPPM/article/view/2951
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ogjppm:v:3:y:2024:i:3:p:15-27:id:2951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/GJPPM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.