IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/oejbsm/v8y2023i1p66-83id1964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Wheat Productivity among Smallholder Farmers in Ngororero District, Rwanda

Author

Listed:
  • Niyimpa Gabriel

  • Dr. Majiwa Eucabeth

  • Dr. Mulyungi Patrick

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the factors influencing wheat productivity in Ngororero district of Rwanda. Wheat is a major food security crop in many countries and has a significant role in poverty reduction, food security and income generation among households in many countries. In Rwanda wheat is a source of food and income and ranks second to maize. Despite its importance, wheat productivity in Rwanda remains low. Methodology: Simple random sampling method was used to select a sample of 100 wheat farmers and an interview schedule was adopted to collect the data from the respondents. The collected data were first entered in MS Excel and then exported to SPSS for editing, coding, classification and then analysed with relevant statistical analysis tools. In addition to SPSS, Frontier 4.1 software was also used to generate outputs necessary for the data analysis. The data were analyzed using a linear regression model and stochastic frontier model. Findings: The ordinary least square estimates revealed that seeds, labour, organic fertilizer and education were significant and influenced wheat productivity among the smallholder farmers in Ngororero district. The maximum likelihood estimates indicated that inputs such as farm size, seed, labour, and organic fertilizer influenced wheat productivity positively while inorganic fertilizer influenced it negatively. Socio-economic factors such as age and farmers' group membership reduced inefficiency while education and household size increased inefficiency among smallholder wheat farmers in Ngororero district. The estimated technical efficiency scores (TE) ranged from 3% to 100% with an average of 49%. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Since the calculated likelihood ratio value (23.107) was less than the critical value (26.22) of at 12degrees of freedom at 1% level of significance, it means that the null hypothesis is accepted and all the coefficients of the second order in the translog function were equal to zero. Thus, the Cobb-Douglas frontier production function adequately captured the production pattern of wheat farmers in Ngororero district. The estimated value of gamma parameter ( ) which is the ratio of the variance output to variance of error was 0.999 and highly significant at 1% level. It is in accordance with the theory that true -value should be greater than zero. The estimated value of is significantly different from zero indicating that random error is playing a significant role in explaining the variation in wheat production and this is evident especially in case of agriculture where uncertainty is assumed to be a main source of variation. However, it should be noted that 99.9 percent variation in output was due to differences in technical inefficiency and the remaining 0.1 percent was due to stochastic random error. The likelihood ratio test is significant at 1% implying that the inefficiency effects are highly significant in the stochastic frontier model. Based on the findings, the study recommends that there is need to enforce and improve mechanisms to avail the required amount of inputs to farmers and at the right time, and to encourage a big number of wheat farmers to join different farmer associations and the cooperatives available in the study area as it was found that being a member of a group enhanced technical efficiency and therefore enhanced the productivity capacity of the farmers through acquisition of inputs such as fertilizer or certified seeds.

Suggested Citation

  • Niyimpa Gabriel & Dr. Majiwa Eucabeth & Dr. Mulyungi Patrick, 2023. "Determinants of Wheat Productivity among Smallholder Farmers in Ngororero District, Rwanda," European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, International Peer Review Journals and Books, vol. 8(1), pages 66-83.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:8:y:2023:i:1:p:66-83:id:1964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/EJBSM/article/view/1964
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:8:y:2023:i:1:p:66-83:id:1964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/EJBSM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.