IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/oejbsm/v4y2019i2p1-23id836.html

Relationship Between Strategic Capabilities And Competitive Advantage In The Kenyan Banking Sector

Author

Listed:
  • James Gathogo Kamau

  • Dr. Susan C. Nzioki

  • Dr. Thomas A. Senaji, R. Eng.

Abstract

Purpose: The Commercial banks operating in Kenya are experiencing a faster pace of change characterized by customers' sophistication, strict regulation and supervision, technology advancement, liberalization of banking license leading to rapid internationalization. Thus this study sought to link strategic capabilities and competitive advantage in the Kenyan banking sector. Methodology: The study is anchored on the McKinsey 7S Framework Model, the Resource Based View, the dynamic capability Theory and the Market Power Theory. A positivist research philosophy was adopted for the study. Focusing on 39 operational commercial banks in Kenya, a descriptive survey design was adopted. Primary data was collected and applied in the study. The relationship between the variables was tested using ordinary east square regression model. On the other hand, the moderating effects of Central Bank of Kenya regulations was also tested using the moderated multiple regression model. Findings: The study findings revealed that strategic capabilities that is knowledge management capability, information technology capability, operational adjustment agility and market capitalizing agility have a positive and significant effect on competitive advantage of commercial banks in Kenya. Furthermore, central bank regulations have a significant moderating effect on the relationship between strategic capabilities and competitive advantage of commercial banks in Kenya. Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The study findings led to the recommendation that the commercial banks should enhance the practices that improves their strategic capabilities. On the other hand, the central bank of Kenya on the other hand should aim to come up with favorable policies which won't hurt the operations of the commercial banks.

Suggested Citation

  • James Gathogo Kamau & Dr. Susan C. Nzioki & Dr. Thomas A. Senaji, R. Eng., 2019. "Relationship Between Strategic Capabilities And Competitive Advantage In The Kenyan Banking Sector," European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, International Peer Review Journals and Books, vol. 4(2), pages 1-23.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:4:y:2019:i:2:p:1-23:id:836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/EJBSM/article/view/836
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Pei-Ying & Ouyang, Tao Hua & Pan, Shan L. & Chou, Tzu-Chuan, 2012. "The role of IT in achieving operational agility: A case study of Haier, China," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 294-298.
    2. Waterman, Robert Jr. & Peters, Thomas J. & Phillips, Julien R., 1980. "Structure is not organization," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 14-26, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James Gathogo Kamau & Dr. Thomas A. Senaji, R. Eng. & Dr. Susan C. Nzioki, 2019. "Effect Of Information Technology Capability On Competitive Advantage Of The Kenyan Banking Sector," International Journal of Technology and Systems, IPRJB, vol. 4(1), pages 1-20.
    2. Nur Nahar Yasmin, 2024. "Four-day workweek in corporate sector: post-pandemic work arrangement for Bangladesh," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(7), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Roelofse, Emmalinde, 2017. "M3 Strategic Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Modes, Models, & Momentum," SocArXiv uafvr_v1, Center for Open Science.
    4. Cathal M. Brugha, 2001. "Implications from Decision Science for the Systems Development Life Cycle in Information Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 91-105, March.
    5. Khraisha, Tamer, 2020. "Complex economic problems and fitness landscapes: Assessment and methodological perspectives," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 390-407.
    6. Fawwaz Tawfiq Awamleh & Ala Nihad Bustami, 2022. "Examine the Mediating Role of the Information Technology Capabilities on the Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence and Competitive Advantage During the COVID-19 Pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    7. Seogjun Lee & Seung Woon Oh & Kichan Nam, 2016. "Transformational and Transactional Factors for the Successful Implementation of Enterprise Architecture in Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Roelofse, Emmalinde, 2017. "M3 Strategic Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Modes, Models, and Momentum," Thesis Commons dwt3a_v1, Center for Open Science.
    9. Rodriguez, Carlos Adrian, 2016. "Challenges to effectiveness in public health organizations: The case of the Costa Rican Health Ministry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3859-3868.
    10. Jennings, David, 1999. "Corporate planning: post-privatization change in a UK electricity utility," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 223-232, December.
    11. Liu, Sen & Chan, Felix T.S. & Yang, Junai & Niu, Ben, 2018. "Understanding the effect of cloud computing on organizational agility: An empirical examination," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 98-111.
    12. Wasike Shadrack Mayende & Owino Odhiambo Joseph, 2021. "Top Management Team Characteristics, Competitive Environment and Strategy Implementation," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(7), pages 147-147, July.
    13. Miskiewicz, Radoslaw, 2017. "Organisational structure in the progress of integration," MPRA Paper 81767, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2017.
    14. Brugha, Cathal M., 1998. "The structure of adjustment decision-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 63-76, January.
    15. Martin Jetter & Gerhard Satzger & Andreas Neus, 2009. "Technological Innovation and Its Impact on Business Model, Organization and Corporate Culture – IBM’s Transformation into a Globally Integrated, Service-Oriented Enterprise," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(1), pages 37-45, February.
    16. Anastassia Stancheva, 2009. "The Enterprise from Management Point of View: Meta-Analysis (Internal Structure and Behavior)," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 67-112.
    17. Jane Nyokabi Njuguna & Juliana Namada & Maina Muchara, 2019. "Differentiation strategy, firm structure and performance of star rated hotels," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(6), pages 08-14, October.
    18. Shteryo Nozharov, 2017. "Efficiency of Public Administration Management in Cultural Heritage Protection," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 307-316, June.
    19. Isaac Lemus-Aguilar & Gustavo Morales-Alonso & Andres Ramirez-Portilla & Antonio Hidalgo, 2019. "Sustainable Business Models through the Lens of Organizational Design: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Piquer-Martinez, Celia & Urionagüena, Amaia & Benrimoj, Shalom I. & Calvo, Begoña & Dineen-Griffin, Sarah & Garcia-Cardenas, Victoria & Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando & Martinez-Martinez, Fernando & Gaste, 2024. "Theories, models and frameworks for health systems integration. A scoping review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:4:y:2019:i:2:p:1-23:id:836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/EJBSM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.