IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/oejbsm/v1y2016i1p20-38id10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing Performance of SACCOS in Kenya: A Case of UNAITAS SACCO

Author

Listed:
  • Edna Mwangi
  • Dr. Leonard Wambua

Abstract

Purpose: The general objective of this study was to establish factors influencing performance of saccos in Kenya: a case Unaitas Sacco.Methodology: The study adopted a case study where primary data was gathered using the questionnaire. The population of the study was all the senior staff (top, middle and supervisory levels of management). There were total 96 such managers in UNAITAS Sacco. The list was obtained from the human resource department. The sample size was 50% of the population. The sample size was therefore 48 managers. The sampling technique/design was simple random sampling. The researcher used quantitative techniques in analyzing the data. The tool of analysis was SPSS version 20 was used. Descriptive analysis was employed; which included; mean standard deviations and frequencies/percentages. Inferential statistics that was used was correlation and regression analysis.Results: Results of the study indicated that organization subculture, organization structure, organization leadership capacity and organization rewarding practices had a positive and significant effect on the performance. The study concluded that organizational subculture, organizational structure, leadership capacity and rewarding practices had an active and direct role in performance.Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The study recommended that the institution should undertake an internal review of the administrative functions that impact the suppression/operations division and identify structure as one the determining factor of performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Edna Mwangi & Dr. Leonard Wambua, 2016. "Factors Influencing Performance of SACCOS in Kenya: A Case of UNAITAS SACCO," European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, International Peer Review Journals and Books, vol. 1(1), pages 20-38.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:20-38:id:10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/EJBSM/article/view/10
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:20-38:id:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/EJBSM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.