IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/oejbsm/v10y2025i3p44-56id3329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Cultural Strategic Management Practices in Global Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Kinoti

Abstract

Purpose: The general objective of this study was to explore cross cultural strategic management practices in global supply chains. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings revealed that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to cross cultural strategic management practices. Preliminary empirical review revealed that cross-cultural strategic management practices were crucial for global supply chain effectiveness, enhancing communication, leadership, and decision-making. Companies that incorporated cultural intelligence experienced better cohesion and resilience, while those neglecting cultural factors faced inefficiencies. The study highlighted the need for standardized cultural frameworks, emphasizing culture as an underutilized strategic asset in global supply chain management. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory, Institutional Theory and Dynamic Capabilities theory may be used to anchor future studies on cross-cultural strategic management practices in global supply chains. The study recommended integrating cross-cultural competencies into strategic frameworks through leadership training, diverse teams, and adaptive technologies. It called for expanding strategic models to include cultural factors, promoting inclusive management structures, and advocating for policy support on cultural training.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Kinoti, 2025. "Cross-Cultural Strategic Management Practices in Global Supply Chains," European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, International Peer Review Journals and Books, vol. 10(3), pages 44-56.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:10:y:2025:i:3:p:44-56:id:3329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/EJBSM/article/view/3329
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:oejbsm:v:10:y:2025:i:3:p:44-56:id:3329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/EJBSM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.