Author
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the comparative study of indoor vs. outdoor sports on social skills development in children in Australia. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: A comparative study on the impact of indoor versus outdoor sports on social skills development in children in Australia revealed notable differences. Outdoor sports, such as soccer and cricket, were found to foster better teamwork, communication, and conflict resolution skills due to their collaborative and dynamic nature in larger team settings. Indoor sports, like basketball and table tennis, also contributed to social skills development but were more associated with enhancing individual communication and strategy-sharing in smaller groups. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social learning theory, ecological systems theory & self-determination theory may be used to anchor future studies on the comparative study of indoor vs. outdoor sports on social skills development in children in Australia. Sport organizations, schools, and recreational centers should design programs that combine both indoor and outdoor sports to maximize the benefits of each environment. Policymakers should create and support initiatives that encourage outdoor sports participation for children, recognizing the broader social and developmental benefits of outdoor play.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ijpers:v:3:y:2025:i:1:p:27-41:id:3178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJPERS/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.