Author
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the assessing the impact of recreational programs on the well-being of senior citizens Methodology: The study adopted a desktop methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library Findings: Participation in recreational programs among senior citizens yielded significantly positive outcomes across various dimensions of well-being. These programs were linked to improved physical health, enhanced social connections, boosted cognitive function, better emotional well-being, and an overall higher quality of life. The cumulative effect of engagement in these activities underlines the importance of recreational programs in promoting well-being among senior citizens. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social Exchange Theory, Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs and Successful Aging Theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the impact of recreational programs on the well-being of senior citizens. Findings can inform the design of recreational programs, tailoring activities to address specific well-being factors like physical health, social connections, and cognitive stimulation Policymakers can incentivize healthcare providers to incorporate recreational programs as part of holistic care for seniors.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ijpers:v:1:y:2023:i:1:p:1-12:id:2143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJPERS/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.