Imperfectly Substitutable Financial Instruments in an Economic Development Model
The ideas put forth in this article are related to the literature on economic growth and development, on one side, and that of the development of financial systems on the other. A simple two-sector model is proposed. In that model, one sector groups activities that are typically present in a developed economy, and the other, those that can usually be associated to a developing economy. Among the things that are required for a country to transition to a specialization on the first group of activities, which is what many developing nations are actively seeking, the model highlights the role of the financial system. In the model, the development of the financial system is primarily indicated by an increase on the variety of financial instruments. As a country develops, it can provide its productive sector with more financial instruments that allow for a more sophisticated production of goods and services. Under certain conditions, the model exhibits multiple equilibrium. The two real sectors in this economy have different production functions. The financial systems comprises two types of actors: (1) individual producers of financial services, and (2) a financial aggregator that produces a synthetic financial instrument combining them. By blending together financial instruments there is a positive effect on the real sector, tantamount to an increase in productivity. The article explores the interaction of real and financial sectors in a developing economy. Many of the problems and bottlenecks found by the development economics school of thought are present here, notably it is shown how hard it could be for a country to transit from low to high stages of development. Pervasive market failures and externalities that have roots in production, and financial asymmetries partly explain that situation. In what comes to the relation between real and financial sectors in the model, there is a two-way external effect (so they affect each other the way externalities do). Economic actors have short term planning horizon when externalities are present. In particular, everyone involved in the production sector (firms and workers) take the variety of financial instruments currently existing at the time they plan their actions as a fact, and they cannot anticipate what that variety (and the more advanced production techniques that that brings along) is going to be in the future. The set up has two main consequences: (1) real and financial sectors tend to evolve together, and rather slowly, and (2) there is scope for government intervention. The model is solved numerically, and it is sound in the sense that it accurately reflects certain stylized factors of real-life economic development processes (related to the development of the financial system vis à vis the real productive sector, the pace of economic growth, and the type of financial development). Also, the model shows (by way of comparative static and numeric simulations) that an improvement in the parameters of the financial system has a positive effect on the economy in the long run. As stated before, it is not implied by the model that an economy that is stuck in a low-income situation will automatically leave that situation behind by means of an autonomous development of its financial or productive systems. Political recommendations implied by this simple model pertain both to the financial and real sectors. In particular, the government could provide directly or indirectly for a wider variety of financial instruments that may have positive impact on the quality and quantity of aggregate production in the economy. These include provision of “missing” financial services in the way development and public banks could do, or introducing specific legislation that will make private suppliers of financial instruments do so. Furthermore, as the development of real and financial sectors goes hand in hand, actions on the real sector (improving dissemination of technical and scientific knowledge, training specific sectors of the population into productive skills, for example) also have an effect on the sustainability of financial reform and the long term availability of the enlarged array of financial instruments. Several countries have successfully tackled this issues, and implemented bills and regulations that improved their economies on both financial and real grounds. Some have gone the way of grandeur (Brazil comes to mind) and others have done so through dedicated and specific interventions that blend “real” and financial ingredients (examples can be found in Chile and Guatemala).
Volume (Year): 1 (2010)
Issue (Month): 57-58 (January - June)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Reconquista 266 - C1003ABF - Buenos Aires|
Phone: (54-11) 4348-3582
Fax: (54-11) 4348-3794
Web page: http://www.bcra.gov.ar
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Peter L. Rousseau & Richard Sylla, 2000.
"Emerging Financial Markets and Early U.S. Growth,"
Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers
0015, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
- Peter L. Rousseau & Richard Sylla, 1999. "Emerging Financial Markets and Early U.S. Growth," NBER Working Papers 7448, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Peter L. Rousseau & Richard Sylla, 2000. "Emerging Financial Markets and Early U.S. Growth," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1254, Econometric Society.
- Marco Da Rin & Thomas Hellmann, 2000.
"Banks as Catalysts for Industrialisation,"
FMG Discussion Papers
dp343, Financial Markets Group.
- Marco Da Rin & Thomas Hellmann, 2001. "Banks as Catalysts for Industrialization," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 443, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
- Da Rin, Marco & Hellmann, Thomas F., 2002. "Banks as Catalysts for Industrialization," Research Papers 1398, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
- Marco Da Rin & Thomas Hellmann, . "Banks as Catalysts for Industrialization," Working Papers 103, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
- Keith Blackburn & Niloy Bose & Salvatore Capasso, 2005.
"Financial Development, Financing Choice and Economic Growth,"
Review of Development Economics,
Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), pages 135-149, 05.
- K Blackburn & N Bose & S Capasso, 2001. "Financial Development, Financing Choice and Economic Growth," Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research Discussion Paper Series 07, Economics, The Univeristy of Manchester.
- Keith Blackburn & Niloy Bose & Salvatore Capasso, 2003. "Financial Development, Financing Choice and Economic Growth," CSEF Working Papers 96, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
- Rousseau, Peter L., 1999. "Finance, investment, and growth in Meiji-era Japan," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 185-198, April.
- Alex Trew, 2007.
"Efficiency, Depth and Growth: Quantitative Implications of Finance and Growth Theory,"
CDMA Working Paper Series
200712, Centre for Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis.
- Trew, Alex, 2008. "Efficiency, depth and growth: Quantitative implications of finance and growth theory," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 1550-1568, December.
- Alex Trew, 2007. "Endogenous Financial Development and Industrial Takeoff," CDMA Working Paper Series 200702, Centre for Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis.
- Alex Trew, 2006.
"Finance and Growth: A Critical Survey,"
The Economic Record,
The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 82(259), pages 481-490, December.
- Rodriguez-Clare, Andres, 1996. "The division of labor and economic development," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 3-32, April.
- Peter L. Rousseau, 2003.
"Historical perspectives on financial development and economic growth,"
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Jul, pages 81-106.
- Peter L. Rousseau, 2002. "Historical Perspectives on Financial Development and Economic Growth," NBER Working Papers 9333, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Feenstra, Robert C & Markusen, James R, 1994.
"Accounting for Growth with New Inputs,"
International Economic Review,
Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 35(2), pages 429-47, May.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcr:ensayo:v:1:y:2010:i:57-58:p:59-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Federico Grillo)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.