IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Stylized Facts for the Argentine Economy

Listed author(s):
  • Soledad Feal Zubimendi



  • Mara Rojas



  • Mariana Inés Zilio



One of the most important objectives of the macroeconomic science is the comprehension of causes and consequences over the economic fluctuations. The statistical characterization of business cycles has been studied by many authors since the influential work by Hodrick and Prescott (1980). However, some problems can appear if we try to analyze the facts in this way. The first problem emerges as soon as we look at the time series. In the study of business cycles it is difficult to establish regularities. For instance, although Argentina was affected by crises more than several developed economies, the unemployment rate in Argentina has not shown large fluctuations. This is true, even though the series were incorrect. The second problem is to obtain reliable data. Maybe, unemployment in Argentina had been underestimated. Since the development of the Real Business Cycle theory, most of the modern macroeconomics has been doing large efforts to understand fluctuations of the macro variables. Criticizing Burns and Mitchell (1946) because of the absence of theoretical support, Lucas (1977) defined cycle movements as income deviations around its tendency and relative change in the macro variables behaviour respect to the income. Looking for behaviour patterns, Hodrick and Prescott (1980) found that some stylized facts announced by Burns and Mitchell (1946) were kept few years later. Actually, the results obtained by Burns and Mitchell (1946) and Hodrick and Prescott (1980) reinforced Lucas´ definition. However, other studies including more variables offered evidence about not keeping regularities. The latter depends on economic structural characteristics and the time period. Kydland and Prescott wrote another work in 1982. They pointed out the possibility that the same analytical tools used to study economic growth could be used to study business cycles too. In this way, the variables which explain business cycles are real factors, rather than nominal ones as in Lucas (1977). In 1990, Kydland and Prescott researched the stylized facts for the American economy. Then, there were many comparative and particular works. Backus and Kehoe (1992) have done a comparative study in which they compared a set of developed countries. Agénor, McDermott and Prasad (1999) have worked with medium-income countries and Loayza, Fajnzylber and Calderón (2004) have studied a set of Latin American countries. The present paper takes as particular references Mendoza (1991), Kydland and Zarazaga (1997), Sáez (2004) and Castillo Montoro and Tuesta (2006), since emergent economies have singular characteristics and all those papers deal with developing countries. Such characteristics could appear in those economies due to two reasons (Agénor et al., 1999). On one hand, the researcher must face the scarcity and low quality of available data. National account systems in developing countries likely have measurement errors, discontinuity on data and deficient estimations. On the other hand, these economies suffer sudden shocks because of their high volatility. Kydland and Zarazaga (1997) have wondered whether the business cycle in Argentina could be explained using the same arguments that explain the business cycle in developed economies. The authors have covered the 1970-1995 period, using two different estimations over product and its components. Even if their results may be considered ambiguous and crucial the period, Kydland and Zarazaga (1997) make up a reference point to this paper, and then our results will be compared to theirs. According to the literature, developing countries are characterized by the large volatility of macroeconomic variables and the major spreading degree of foreign shocks. Perhaps we can still find some regularity from the Argentine economy. In this work, we will try to introduce the stylized facts analysis on Argentina through the cross-correlation study in the 1990-2007 period. We used the Hodrick and Prescott filter, with and without applying the pre-whitening procedure. Intuitively, the results obtained in this paper seem to be correct although some of them do not have correspondence with business cycle theory and point out some differences with reference to Kydland and Zarazaga (1997) report on the Argentine economy. During consecutive crisis, Argentina has exhibited a specific behaviour which has been different from those patterns exhibited by developed countries. Nevertheless, the main variables have kept a similar behavior.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: Spanish version (versión en Español)
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Central Bank of Argentina, Economic Research Department in its journal Ensayos Económicos.

Volume (Year): 1 (2009)
Issue (Month): 56 (October - December)
Pages: 157-210

in new window

Handle: RePEc:bcr:ensayo:v:1:y:2009:i:56:p:157-210
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Reconquista 266 - C1003ABF - Buenos Aires

Phone: (54-11) 4348-3582
Fax: (54-11) 4348-3794
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Baxter, Marianne & Kouparitsas, Michael A., 2005. "Determinants of business cycle comovement: a robust analysis," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 113-157, January.
  2. Harvey, A C & Jaeger, A, 1993. "Detrending, Stylized Facts and the Business Cycle," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(3), pages 231-247, July-Sept.
  3. R. Mantegna, 1999. "Hierarchical structure in financial markets," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 193-197, September.
  4. Finn E. Kydland & Edward C. Prescott, 1990. "Business cycles: real facts and a monetary myth," Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, issue Spr, pages 3-18.
  5. Juan J. Dolado & Miguel Sebastián & Javier Vallés, 1993. "Ciclical patterns of the spanish economy," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 17(3), pages 445-473, September.
  6. Don Harding & Adrian Pagan, 1999. "Dissecting the Cycle," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp1999n13, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
  7. Francisco Andre & Javier Perez, 2005. "Robust stylized facts on comovement for the Spanish economy," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 453-462.
  8. Cooley, Thomas F. & Ohanian, Lee E., 1991. "The cyclical behavior of prices," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 25-60, August.
  9. Canova, Fabio, 1998. "Detrending and business cycle facts: A user's guide," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 533-540, May.
  10. Mankiw, N Gregory, 1989. "Real Business Cycles: A New Keynesian Perspective," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 3(3), pages 79-90, Summer.
  11. Canova, Fabio, 1998. "Detrending and business cycle facts," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 475-512, May.
  12. Andre, Francisco J. & Perez, Javier J. & Martin, Ricardo, 2002. "Computing white stylized facts on comovement," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 65-71, June.
  13. José Luis Machinea & Cecilia Vera, 2005. "Comercio, inversión directa y políticas productivas," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 56778, Inter-American Development Bank.
  14. Christopher A. Sims, 1996. "Macroeconomics and Methodology," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 10(1), pages 105-120, Winter.
  15. Mendoza, Enrique G, 1991. "Real Business Cycles in a Small Open Economy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(4), pages 797-818, September.
  16. Norman Loayza & Pablo Fajnzylber & César Calderón, 2005. "Economic Growth in Latin America and the Caribbean : Stylized Facts, Explanations, and Forecasts," World Bank Publications, The World Bank, number 7315, September.
  17. Agenor, Pierre-Richard & McDermott, C John & Prasad, Eswar S, 2000. "Macroeconomic Fluctuations in Developing Countries: Some Stylized Facts," World Bank Economic Review, World Bank Group, vol. 14(2), pages 251-285, May.
  18. Lucas, Robert E., 1977. "Understanding business cycles," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 7-29, January.
  19. Finn E. Kydland & Calos E.J.M.Zarazaga, 1997. "Is the business cycle of Argentina "different?"," Economic and Financial Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, issue Q IV, pages 21-36.
  20. Castillo, Paul & Montoro, Carlos & Tuesta, Vicente, 2007. "Hechos estilizados de la economía peruana," Revista Estudios Económicos, Banco Central de Reserva del Perú, issue 14, pages 33-75.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcr:ensayo:v:1:y:2009:i:56:p:157-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Federico Grillo)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.