IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbz/fcpbbr/v1y2004i2p118-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond Budgeting: any chance for managementimprovement?

Author

Listed:
  • Fábio Frezatti

    (University of São Paulo)

Abstract

This study makes a comparative analysis of the discussion pointsbrought up by Hope and Fraser in questioning what they call the “traditional”company budget format, with a view to identifying aspects that offer more adequateand effective company management opportunities to organizations. In this sense, theconfrontation between both authors and the traditional ones leads to the conclusionthat, once again, this discussion deals with a new cycle that tries to recover classicqualitative budget aspects that, once complied with, do not need a new label for thesake of effective company management. Although the approach recommends thepossibility of not having an annual budget, strictly speaking, it proposes to emphasizea more strategic discussion, front line participation, greater confidence in managers,periodic result forecasting and elimination of the “fixed contract”, among otherelements. The critical analysis was divided into two groups so as to distinguishbetween criticism in relation to budget limitations and that resulting from itsinadequate usage. Finally, the authors do not solve some problems that may becaused by the nonexistence of a budget, besides creating other problems that wouldnot exist without the proposal.

Suggested Citation

  • Fábio Frezatti, 2004. "Beyond Budgeting: any chance for managementimprovement?," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 1(2), pages 118-135, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:1:y:2004:i:2:p:118-135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/download/478/724
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    company budget; strategic.;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:1:y:2004:i:2:p:118-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Lasso (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fucapbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.