IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbl/journl/v28y2025i2p49-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon emission trading policy and green technological innovation in Chinese listed companies: A corporate reputation perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Xinfeng Jiang

    (Huazhong Agricultural University)

  • Jiakun Xu

    (Huazhong Agricultural University)

  • Rong Ma

    (Huazhong Agricultural University)

  • Ahsan Akbar

    (Guangzhou City University of Technology)

  • Marcela Sokolova

    (University of Hradec Kralove)

Abstract

The carbon emission trading policy (CET) makes enterprises’ pollution information transparent and is an important environmental regulation tool for China to achieve the goal of “carbon peak” and “carbon neutrality.” Taking A-share listed companies in China’s Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchange from 2008 to 2021 as a research sample, this paper chooses the implementation of China’s carbon emission trading policy in seven pilot regions as a quasi-natural experimental scenario and takes 2014 as the inception time of the policy to construct the difference-in-difference model with the fixed effect. The research then employs a multiple regression model and other statistical methods, such as an event study and placebo test, to examine the impact and mechanism of carbon emission trading policies on companies’ green technological innovation. The study reveals that CET significantly improves enterprises’ green technological innovation, attributed to weighing benefits against costs and preserving corporate reputation. Compared to purchasing carbon quotas for a long time, green technological innovation is a sustainable development strategy for enterprises, saving pollution costs and enhancing corporate reputation. The effect of CET on green technological innovation is more pronounced in larger enterprises, polluting industries, and regions where policy implementation is more rigorous. Enterprises that carry out green technological innovation to comply with CET can enjoy better reputations and lower financial costs. This study enriches and expands the research horizon of the impact of carbon trading policy on enterprises’ green technological innovation, examining it from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. It demonstrates that green technological innovation is a long-term strategic choice for enterprises, providing implications for achieving superior policy advantages. In addition, the research shows that CET alleviates information asymmetry and facilitates the disclosure of carbon information, offering an opportunity for external stakeholders to better oversee their corporations.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinfeng Jiang & Jiakun Xu & Rong Ma & Ahsan Akbar & Marcela Sokolova, 2025. "Carbon emission trading policy and green technological innovation in Chinese listed companies: A corporate reputation perspective," E&M Economics and Management, Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, vol. 28(2), pages 49-66, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bbl:journl:v:28:y:2025:i:2:p:49-66
    DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2025-2-003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2025-2-003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15240/tul/001/2025-2-003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Carbon emission trading policy; corporate green technological innovation; corporate reputation perspective; equilibrium of costs and benefits; alleviate information asymmetry;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • Q59 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbl:journl:v:28:y:2025:i:2:p:49-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vendula Pospisilova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hflibcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.