IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bba/j00004/v2y2023i4p28-32d179.html

The gap between formalism and empirical science: the example of the non-dictatorship condition

Author

Listed:
  • W. Robert J. Alexander

    (School of Business and Creative Industries, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia)

Abstract

Since the establishment of neoclassical economics in the nineteenth century, there has been a debate in the economics profession over the role played by mathematics. Mathematics can add precision to discussion of real-world empirical problems in economics, but care needs to be taken when formalizing a problem to ensure that errors of translation are not made. Formalism allows one to be sure that a chain of reasoning is correct but applying conclusions back to an empirical science problem is fraught if an error of translation has been made. We illustrate such a difficulty in the context of Arrow’s impossibility theorem, specifically the mistranslation of the non-dictatorship condition. The notion of dictatorship entails causality, but causality does not correspond to the usage of the implication sign in mathematics or logic. We use the rules of logic to illustrate that the way that dictatorship is rendered mathematically in the impossibility theorem makes the existence of a dictator (or dictators) not only reasonable but likely.

Suggested Citation

  • W. Robert J. Alexander, 2023. "The gap between formalism and empirical science: the example of the non-dictatorship condition," Economic Analysis Letters, Anser Press, vol. 2(4), pages 28-32, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bba:j00004:v:2:y:2023:i:4:p:28-32:d:179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/eal/2/4/39/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/eal/2/4/39
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hahn, F H, 1970. "Some Adjustment Problems," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria-Augusta Miceli & Federico Cecconi & Giovanni Cerulli, 2013. "Walrasian Tatonnement by Sequential Pairwise Trading: Convergence and Welfare Implications," Working Papers in Public Economics 161, Department of Economics and Law, Sapienza University of Rome.
    2. Burdett, Kenneth, 1989. "Search Market Models: A Survey," Working Paper Series 234, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    3. Michael E. Porter & A. Michael Spence, 1982. "The Capacity Expansion Process in a Growing Oligopoly: The Case of Corn Wet Milling," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Information and Uncertainty, pages 259-316, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Vallès Codina, Oriol, 2023. "Business cycles, sectoral price stabilization, and climate change mitigation: A model of multi-sector growth in the tradition of the Bielefeld disequilibrium approach," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 636-653.
    5. David Marcos, 2020. "Transaction Costs in Execution Trading," Papers 2007.07998, arXiv.org.
    6. José Romero, 2021. "Economía Evolutiva," Serie documentos de trabajo del Centro de Estudios Económicos 2021-03, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos.
    7. Chan Young Bang, 1973. "Towards a Dynamic Disequilibrium;Some Queries Regarding Methodological Analogy of Statics and Dynamics in Economics," UCLA Economics Working Papers 37A, UCLA Department of Economics.
    8. Jorge Iván González, 2016. "Sentimientos y racionalidad en economía," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Economía, edition 1, number 75.
    9. Lawrence A. Boland & Irene M. Gordon, 1992. "Criticizing positive accounting theory," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 142-170, September.
    10. Paul Oslington, 2012. "General Equilibrium: Theory and Evidence," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 88(282), pages 446-448, September.
    11. Charles G. Renfro, 2009. "The Practice of Econometric Theory," Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics, Springer, number 978-3-540-75571-5.
    12. Vipin P. Veetil, 2016. "Out-of-Equilibrium Dynamics with Heterogeneous Capital Goods," New Mathematics and Natural Computation (NMNC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(02), pages 157-173, July.
    13. Victor Zarnowitz, 1979. "Information, Measurement, And Prediction In Economics," NBER Working Papers 0318, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. W D A Bryant, 2009. "General Equilibrium:Theory and Evidence," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 6875.
    15. Daniel Bromley, 2004. "Reconsidering Environmental Policy: Prescriptive Consequentialism and Volitional Pragmatism," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 28(1), pages 73-99, May.
    16. K. Vela Velupillai & Stefano Zambelli, 2010. "The Epistemology of Simulation, Computation and Dynamics in Economics Ennobling Synergies, Enfeebling 'Perfection'," ASSRU Discussion Papers 1002, ASSRU - Algorithmic Social Science Research Unit.
    17. Carolina Alves, 2026. "Theory and realism in economics: Richard R. Nelson, equilibrium and economic change," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 53(1), pages 95-113, March.
    18. Ramser, Hans Jürgen, 1981. "Stand und Entwicklungsperspektiven der Konjunkturtheorie," Discussion Papers, Series I 158, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.
    19. Tony Lawson, 2014. "Modelación matemática e ideología en la economía académica," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 16(30), pages 25-51, January-J.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bba:j00004:v:2:y:2023:i:4:p:28-32:d:179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ramona Wang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.anserpress.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.