IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bba/j00001/v4y2025i3p44-64d430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the ‘Double Reduction’ Policy Reduce ‘Rat Race’? A Natural Experimental Study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Arestis

    (Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK)

  • Mianshan Lai

    (China Center for Special Economic Zone Research, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China)

  • Jiale Yang

    (College of Economics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China)

  • Yuexun Zhong

    (College of Economics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China)

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of an unprecedented education policy called ‘double reduction’ (DR) on students’ performance, with evidence from China. One of the significant changes brought about by this policy is the transition of examination scores from a numerical system to a grading system. We found a junior middle school in a small town in Guangzhou that met the requirements for a natural experiment, and we used such unique data to examine three hypotheses. After the implementation of DR, the ‘rat race’ reflected on the students’ grade is reduced. To examine heterogeneity, we apply quantile regression showing that the high-ability students exert less efforts on the ‘rat race’ than low-ability students. Meanwhile, we also provide possible explanations in terms of this phenomenon. Overall, this study not only does it assess the grading transformation that DR policy induced but also fills the gap in the field of DR from an economic perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Arestis & Mianshan Lai & Jiale Yang & Yuexun Zhong, 2025. "Does the ‘Double Reduction’ Policy Reduce ‘Rat Race’? A Natural Experimental Study in China," Journal of Economic Analysis, Anser Press, vol. 4(3), pages 44-64, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bba:j00001:v:4:y:2025:i:3:p:44-64:d:430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/jea/4/3/111/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/jea/4/3/111
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bba:j00001:v:4:y:2025:i:3:p:44-64:d:430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ramona Wang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.anserpress.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.