IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bba/j00001/v3y2024i3p190-206d230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Value of Less-Lethal Weapons

Author

Listed:
  • Johnathan Mun

    (Information Sciences Department, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, USA)

  • Seth McAnally

    (Information Sciences Department, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, USA)

  • Jayden Mun

    (Information Sciences Department, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, USA)

  • Emma Mun

    (Information Sciences Department, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, USA)

Abstract

Less-Lethal Weapons, including electric Tasers, velocity-reduction bullet-capture projectiles, rubber bullets, beanbag rounds, and other less-lethal projectiles used in police departments, federal and local law enforcement agencies, and military policing operations, as well as for private use, are topics of significant debate in recent years. These weapons can reduce collateral damage, reputational risk, and legal exposure while preventing wrongful and unnecessary deaths caused by conventional bullet wounds. Yet, opponents have highlighted concerns regarding the safety and effectiveness of these weapons, as well as their potential to cause injury or even death. While the primary duty of law enforcement officials is to preserve order and execute the law while protecting individual rights, they ultimately achieve these goals by exercising their coercive authority. Society expects police officers to rely on their professional training and judgment when using physical force to defend citizens and themselves or to apprehend criminal suspects. Because police officers must occasionally participate in physical acts of coercion, it is unavoidable that some of these interactions may result in bodily injuries to individuals, including the officers themselves. These injuries have real costs, such as medical treatment, lost wages, municipal liability, court claims and settlements, riots, and legal or even criminal exposure, as well as less-tangible collateral costs, such as the erosion of police legitimacy and public trust, which are more difficult to quantify but arguably more influential in shaping long-term public perceptions than personal injuries alone. Less lethal technology eliminates some of the concerns raised by lethal weaponry. This study reviews the advantages and disadvantages of these less-lethal weapon technologies versus traditional firearms for use by the police force, federal agencies, and military police while also performing advanced analytics to model the valuation and return on investment for a law enforcement organization implementing such technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Johnathan Mun & Seth McAnally & Jayden Mun & Emma Mun, 2024. "The Value of Less-Lethal Weapons," Journal of Economic Analysis, Anser Press, vol. 3(3), pages 190-206, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bba:j00001:v:3:y:2024:i:3:p:190-206:d:230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/jea/3/3/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/jea/3/3/73
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bba:j00001:v:3:y:2024:i:3:p:190-206:d:230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ramona Wang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.anserpress.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.