IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bba/j00001/v1y2022i2p50-65d24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Urban High-quality Development Level based on Entropy Weight-TOPSIS Two-step Method

Author

Listed:
  • Yushan Qiu

    (School of Economics and Statistics, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China)

  • Shuaishuai Jia

    (Institute of Finance, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China)

  • Jianping Liao

    (School of Economics and Statistics, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China)

  • Xiaohan Yang

    (Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance, London, United Kingdom)

Abstract

Based on fully considering the actual differences in statistical indicators between Hong Kong, Macao, and the nine cities in the Pearl River Delta, this paper constructs a high-quality urban development evaluation system that is suitable for the actual development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. The Entropy Weighted TOPSIS two-step method is used to process data and systematically investigate the changes in the high-quality development index of 11 cities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area from 2013 to 2020. The study found that the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area has thoroughly implemented the new development concept, and the level of high-quality development has continued to improve. The profound integration effect of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area has appeared, and it has promoted the high-quality development of the region in coordination. The construction of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area has strongly promoted the great practice of "one country, two systems" to achieve stability and prosperity.

Suggested Citation

  • Yushan Qiu & Shuaishuai Jia & Jianping Liao & Xiaohan Yang, 2022. "Evaluation of Urban High-quality Development Level based on Entropy Weight-TOPSIS Two-step Method," Journal of Economic Analysis, Anser Press, vol. 1(2), pages 50-65, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bba:j00001:v:1:y:2022:i:2:p:50-65:d:24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/jea/1/2/12/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/jea/1/2/12
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bba:j00001:v:1:y:2022:i:2:p:50-65:d:24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ramona Wang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.anserpress.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.