IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bau/ijaefs/v2y2017i1id100.html

Evaluation of Participatory Budgeting in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmet ÖZEN

    (Dokuz Eylül University)

  • Uğur DİKİCİ

    (Dokuz Eylül University)

  • Fatma YAPICI

    (Dokuz Eylül University)

Abstract

Participation of the citizens at the budgeting processes which is to show the public's financial plan and tasks an ideal in terms of democracy. During the first era is a direct democracy model had been admitted in Ancient Greece. Representative democracy models adopted in contemporary democracies that foresee participation by representatives in the management and decision processes instead of citizens, and as a result of that model citizens are left out of the process in the sense of direct decision in the 1980s participation had began to be discussed at all over the world . Participatory processes had become a discussion topic in Turkey at the beginning of the 90s. In 1992, Agenda 21, which was structured with the Rio Declaration, were established. Participatory processes supported by co-created projects by the help of harmonization process through European Union. Çanakkale Municipality and Uşak Special Provincial Administration prepared case studies on participatory budgeting. Support Project for Local Government Reform, Project for Municipal Partnership Networks, Turkish-Swedish Local Authorities Partnership, and information on municipal capacity development will be examined at the scope of this study. The Agenda 21 and application of the Local Agenda 21 will examine then the European Union Autonomy Charter and the participant outlook will be exlpained To conclude experiments of participatory processes via city councils, Çanakkale and Uşak city’s implementations will be indicated.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:bau:ijaefs:v:2:y:2017:i:1:id:100
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://journal.bauderpress.org.tr/index.php/ijaefs/article/view/100
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://journal.bauderpress.org.tr/index.php/ijaefs/article/download/100/37
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bau:ijaefs:v:2:y:2017:i:1:id:100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bilimsel Araştırmalar ve Uygulamalar Derneği (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.bauderpress.org.tr/index.php/ijaefs .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.