IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econth/y2007i2p29-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodology of the Corporate Economic Knowledge Accordance with the Philosophy of Science

Author

Listed:
  • Trifon Trifonov

Abstract

Considered in the paper are the problems of development of the corporate economic knowledge in the light of philosophy of science from 20th century. Outlined is the necessity of financial categories and approaches’ interpretation on the basis of the concepts for critical rationality, scientific demarcation, criteria for falsification and others. Emphasis is put on the positive aspects of the modern philosophy interpretation of the economic science.

Suggested Citation

  • Trifon Trifonov, 2007. "Methodology of the Corporate Economic Knowledge Accordance with the Philosophy of Science," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 29-49.
    • Handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2007:i:2:p:29-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issueid=829df93f-e0fa-43ae-85be-de6b383ae898&articleid=0e542497-0e05-41cd-9511-2753100a905d#a0e542497-0e05-41cd-9511-2753100a905d
    Download Restriction: Fee access
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2007:i:2:p:29-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.