IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econth/y2004i3p3-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The “Bulgarian paradox” – Economic Growth Which Arouses No Optimism

Author

Listed:
  • Stoyadin Savov

Abstract

This article challenges the formulation of the paradox “there is growth, but it arouses no optimism“. The author defends the proposition that the existing economic growth does not give rise to optimism because it does not lead to increased level and quality of life among low-income social strata. The macroeconomic indicators of the former are interpreted not only from the viewpoint of the average Bulgarian, but also in view of decile groups income distribution. Searching an answer to the above question, there are formulated 6 hypotheses, the fifth being “the dynamics of social inequality and the loss of social status during the years of transition”. It is the most plausible but it has not been defended adequately and is overlooked in the discussions that take place. The present article presents some comments on the these issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Stoyadin Savov, 2004. "The “Bulgarian paradox” – Economic Growth Which Arouses No Optimism," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 3-25.
    • Handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2004:i:3:p:3-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issueid=364a4a3f-9773-4819-8a96-6c8235a1bd22&articleid=f66087c8-7283-4663-a9f5-c8c8ae46c174#af66087c8-7283-4663-a9f5-c8c8ae46c174
    Download Restriction: Fee access
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D33 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Factor Income Distribution
    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2004:i:3:p:3-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.