IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Experience with and lessons from the first years of EU membership – The Hungarian case

Listed author(s):
  • András Inotai
Registered author(s):

    The accession of ten new countries to the European Union in May 2004 did not produce any major problem in the everyday functioning of the integration. At the same time, in the new members, no wonder happened either. Most of the negative expectations linked to accession proved unjustified or mainly due to deficiencies in the preparation for membership. The article analysis the impact of accession on growth, inflation, employment, small- and medium-sized companies, regional development, budget and political sovereignty. The main conclusion is that eventual negative developments cannot be linked to EU accession but to home-made economic policy failures in the previous years. Of course, it is always easier to blame external factors, including now Brussels for own mistakes. In other areas, where membership created a new situation, the expected impacts could be identified well in advance (e.g. sovereignty). A separate chapter deals with the two-year balance of accession. Trade with the new member countries shows a dramatic growth, particularly in exports. As a result, the traditional trade deficit turned to a substantial surplus within a period of two years, indicating the (regional) competitiveness of the Hungarian economy. The success of adjustment can be proved by the smooth transposition of EU directives and guidelines related to the internal market. Less promising were Hungarian developments concerning the main objectives of the renewed Lisbon agenda. In turn, Hungarians were successful in applying for higher positions in different EU institutions. Also, level and structure of utilizing EU funds can be considered satisfactory, excepting the delayed direct payments to farmers. With membership, Hungary became a policy-shaper of EU decisions and politics. In the first years, however, this manouevring room has not been adequately used, since the traditional, historically rooted unilateral policy-taker behaviour and mentality could not yet be overcome. Another important problem is the deeply divided Hungarian society between two basic political parties and strategies that does not only appear in the different approach to global and European developments but seriously hinders the identification and implementation of Hungarian strategic interests in the enlarged European Union.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Fee access

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute in its journal Economic Studies.

    Volume (Year): (2007)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 3-15

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2007:i:1:p:3-15
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    3, Aksakov Str., 1040, Sofia

    Phone: (+359 2) 810 40 18
    Fax: (+359 2) 988 21 08
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2007:i:1:p:3-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Diana Dimitrova)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.