Author
Abstract
The object of research is managerial economics, which is considered as a component of economic theory. The scientific problem is that there are such concepts as management and managerial economics, which are tangential and somewhat overlapping. Managerial economics is included in the structure of the economic system as a separate component. It is also proven that managerial economics is a systemic entity and has the following levels: global, macro-, meso-, micro- and nano-. The study defined these levels and outlined the use of the global (international) and macro levels. Analysis of these categories is necessary for understanding the governance and governance conditions of global and national economies. The essence of the obtained results is that the existing system of managing international relations is inflexible and difficult to solve the global problems of humanity. And the management of national economies must correspond to the strategic development plans of a particular nation. These obtained results can be explained by the immobility of management structures and the need to revise the global economic order. At the state level, there should be levers for regulating economic relations.It was noted in the work that society is a set of people united at a certain stage of historical development by one or another economic relations that determine all other social relations. The economic life of society consists of various phenomena and processes, the essence of which must be sought in social production. The concept of «managerial economics» is often used to characterize the regulation of social production. There are different approaches to defining the content of managerial economics. First, managerial economy is considered as regulation by a set of industries and types of material production. Secondly, a system of regulation of productive forces and production relations is usually associated with managerial economics. Thirdly, managerial economics regulates the conditions for achieving equilibrium and cyclicality of social production.
Suggested Citation
Tetiana Ostapenko, 2024.
"Development of managerial economics as a component of economic theory,"
Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 3(4(77)), pages 15-20, June.
Handle:
RePEc:baq:taprar:v:3:y:2024:i:4:p:15-20
DOI: 10.15587/2706-5448.2024.307356
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:baq:taprar:v:3:y:2024:i:4:p:15-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Prudius (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.uran.ua/tarp/issue/archive .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.