IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-074220239418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metaverse: Model Criminal Code

Author

Listed:
  • Oleksii Kostenko

    (State Scientific Institution "Institute of Information, Security and Law of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine", Ukraine)

  • Dmytro Zhuravlov

    (Office of the President of Ukraine, Ukraine)

  • Oleksii Dniprov

    (Office of the President of Ukraine, Ukraine)

  • Oksana Korotiuk

    (State Tax University, Ukraine)

Abstract

The Scientific and Technical Revolution 5.0 and WEB 3.0 technologies create conditions for the renovation of various forms of social relations with the use of virtual and augmented reality technologies in the metaverse. According to the proposed theory, the legal regulation of social relations in the metaverse requires the development of a comprehensive electronic jurisdiction based on the latest basic legislation. The formation of legal regulation of the metaverse is a prerequisite for the need to form an electronic jurisdiction of the metaverse, which will include sectoral Metaverse Codes. The metaverse, as the electronic society of the future, does not yet have clear legal boundaries, and the task of scholars is to predict and outline with sufficient certainty the future contours of legal authority for virtual environments. Today, discussions in the scientific community about the feasibility and necessity of legal regulation of the metaverse often revolve around several key issues. First, there is the question of what legal framework should be applied in the metaverse and how conflicts between different legal systems should be resolved. Second, there is a debate about whether current regulatory bodies in the physical world have the capacity to effectively regulate the metaverse through existing laws and regulations. Third, there is the question of how to deal with offences committed in the virtual environment, and whether they should be dealt with under existing tort or criminal law, or whether a separate cross-border electronic jurisdiction should be created. The regulation of social relations in the metaverse should focus on one central goal: to clearly define the status of electronic entities, subjects and objects, to establish their rights, duties and responsibilities, and to define the different types of relations between virtual entities, subjects and objects within a given metaverse, as well as between different metaverses within an electronic jurisdiction and in a cross-border context. An essential component of the Metaverse Electronic Jurisdiction is a Metaverse Model Criminal Code that will outline the norms and offences applicable to analogue, hybrid and electronic jurisdictions. This code will define the types of socially harmful acts or crimes and the corresponding criminal penalties that will be applied within the metaverse. The formation of the electronic jurisdiction of the metaverse and the development of a Metaverse Model Criminal Code is a current scientific and legal issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleksii Kostenko & Dmytro Zhuravlov & Oleksii Dniprov & Oksana Korotiuk, 2023. "Metaverse: Model Criminal Code," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 9(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2023:9:4:18
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-4-134-147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/2211/2210
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/2211
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-4-134-147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    metaverse; metaverse electronic jurisdiction; Metaverse Criminal Code; avatar; electronic personality; electronic humanoid; identification data; blockchain; AI; cryptocurrency; virtual objects; ownership of virtual objects; intellectual property; cybercrime; virtual crime; legal regulation of the metaverse;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K24 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Cyber Law
    • K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2023:9:4:18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.