IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-074220239323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation Of The Principles Of Administrative Procedure In The Provision Of Digital Public Services: Eu Experience And Ukrainian Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Khliborob

    (Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine)

  • Oleksandr Boiarsky

    (Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi City-Raion Court of Odesa Oblast, Ukraine)

  • Halyna Zabolotna

    (Ivan Franko National Lviv National University, Ukraine)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the implementation of the principles of administrative procedure in the provision of digital public services, focusing on the experience of EU countries and Ukrainian practice. The purpose of the study is to analyse the application of administrative procedural principles in the provision of digital public services, to assess the effectiveness of their implementation and to draw lessons for improving digital public services. The subject of the study is the search for ways to improve Ukrainian legislation on the administrative procedure of providing digital government services in accordance with the standards of EU countries. Methodology. The study uses general and special methods of scientific cognition. The method of analysis and synthesis makes it possible to analyse EU legislation and standards, national legislation, data from international official ratings, scientific publications, strategies and expert reviews in order to identify specific features of digital governance systems in EU countries. The comparative legal method makes it possible to see the main trends in the development of digital government initiatives, to outline the main directions and vectors of their implementation, and also to highlight the Ukrainian context of digital transformation and e-government initiatives with EU countries and. The systems method allows for a comprehensive study of the principles of administrative procedure, such as transparency, accessibility, efficiency and user-centredness, in the provision of digital public services in the context of digital governance. The comparative analysis method highlights the specifics of legal regulation of digital innovations in public administration in EU countries as well as in Estonia, Germany and Poland. Results. It has been established that EU countries have made significant progress in integrating the principles of administrative procedures into the provision of digital services, which has led to increased efficiency, user satisfaction and trust in public services. Ukrainian practice shows progress in aligning with these principles, with notable progress in expanding the availability of e-services and increasing automation. However, challenges remain in relation to ethical and legal frameworks, data protection and copyright issues in the use of digital technologies. This study contributes to the understanding of best practices in this area and offers practical recommendations for the further development of digital public services in Ukraine.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Khliborob & Oleksandr Boiarsky & Halyna Zabolotna, 2023. "Implementation Of The Principles Of Administrative Procedure In The Provision Of Digital Public Services: Eu Experience And Ukrainian Practice," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 9(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2023:9:3:23
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-3-207-213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/2146/2151
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/2146
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-3-207-213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    administrative procedure; digital transformation; public services; automatic solutions; foreign experience; EU countries;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • F31 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Exchange

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2023:9:3:23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.