IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aza/rmfi00/y2008v1i2p165-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using non-traditional data for underwriting loans to thin-file borrowers: Evidence, tips and precautions

Author

Listed:
  • Turner, Michael A.
  • Agarwal, Amita

Abstract

Sustainable growth in underserved domestic markets has long been a challenge to lenders. Recent testing with non-traditional data in automated underwriting shows promise as a means to profitably extend credit to the ‘thin-file’ and ‘no-file’ populations without assuming undue risk. This area is in its infancy, and is fraught with risk and challenge. Despite the potential, lenders are advised to proceed with caution and should slowly test their way into this segment with the new methods. As this is a slow process, one of the key challenges is to get the needed commitment from the lending institutions. A prudent credit risk officer can harness the power of non-traditional data by taking a disciplined and methodical approach to testing and implementing. This paper demonstrates the value of non-traditional data as a powerful tool for consumer credit risk assessment while highlighting some of the potential risks and precautions that lenders need to think about before using these tools. Special emphasis is placed on paying attention to the capacity of these customers and creating a life cycle strategy for them that includes credit education. This paper presents some empirical test results, and outlines steps that should be taken by lenders to capture the full value of the data while mitigating risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Turner, Michael A. & Agarwal, Amita, 2008. "Using non-traditional data for underwriting loans to thin-file borrowers: Evidence, tips and precautions," Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 1(2), pages 165-180, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:aza:rmfi00:y:2008:v:1:i:2:p:165-180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/2022/download/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/2022/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    credit risk; non-financial payment reporting; thin-file; automated underwriting; alternative data; credit scoring;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • E5 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:rmfi00:y:2008:v:1:i:2:p:165-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.