Author
Listed:
- Gorsline, Ron
- Hosie, Justin
Abstract
Based on market demand for increased efficiency, banks, merchants and processors continuously develop new ways to transfer funds. Legal processes developed to accommodate paper cheques have experienced significant change, allowing merchants to take funds from consumer cheque accounts without the consumer ever touching a cheque. Remotely created cheques allow consumers to authorise merchants to create and sign a cheque from the consumer's bank account. Merchants obtain authorisation by telephone and internet, and then create cheques for payment from the consumer's bank account. Because remotely created cheques are susceptible to fraud and forgery, the Federal Reserve Board and Uniform Commercial Code switched traditional rules, and will hold the merchant's bank liable for remotely created cheque forgery, rather than the consumer's bank. Under Check 21, merchants can scan cheques, but scan and transmit substitute cheque images rather than physically presenting consumer cheques to the consumer's bank. This process increases efficiency, but requires the merchant's bank to warrant the validity of the substitute cheque. The third process, 'electronic cheque presentment' allows cheque clearing based only on digital information submitted by merchants, based on clearinghouse rules. Similarly, 'electronic cheque conversion' allows merchants to use cheques as a source of information to transfer money electronically. Electronic fund transfers are a process to transfer funds through an electronic terminal, telephone, computer, magnetic tape or to instruct a financial institution to debit or credit an account. When a consumer authorises such transfers on a recurring basis, special preauthorised electronic fund transfer rules apply under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E. While each method of obtaining funds brings unique benefits, they bring risks as well. For example, many state laws do not explicitly authorise merchants to charge returned cheque fees for debit entries returned unpaid.
Suggested Citation
Gorsline, Ron & Hosie, Justin, 2009.
"When is a cheque not a cheque?,"
Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 3(2), pages 139-156, April.
Handle:
RePEc:aza:jpss00:y:2009:v:3:i:2:p:139-156
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
- E5 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:jpss00:y:2009:v:3:i:2:p:139-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.