Author
Abstract
Now more than ever, business professionals face an evolving array of risks to the ultimate success of their business. Cyber risk is proving to be a rapidly iterative threat, legal and compliance risk evolves as political landscapes change, operational risk grows more complex as organisations continue to move towards automation and the ever-present desire to please the customer keeps reputational risk top-of-mind for many of today’s leaders. One of the biggest challenges organisations, and their risk professionals, face is how to effectively distil all the risk and control data that is gathered through various sources into intelligent, coherent, and consistent risk reporting, reporting that executives can easily decipher and rely upon to make strategic decisions for the safety and soundness of their company. In this paper, the reader will learn some basic concepts that have worked for the author across several different types of organisations, both big and small, in the US Consumer Lending industry but have relevance to any type of business operating in the financial sector. The concepts discussed may seem somewhat rudimentary on their own, but when executed collectively arm the risk professional with a well-built mission statement upon which to navigate through various industry and organisational challenges. The concepts can be used to mitigate the difficulties of executing a risk programme in a dysfunctional organisation or can optimise an already impactful and efficient programme in a supportive organisational culture. One will find that organisational culture plays a dramatic role in the overall success of a risk reporting programme, but by adhering to the key concepts, the reader can aspire to drive change for the better by helping their leadership see the value of logical, credible and consistent risk reporting.
Suggested Citation
Humphrey, Tim, 2020.
"Establishing sustainable risk reporting that unlocks trust and organisational value,"
Journal of Financial Compliance, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 3(3), pages 208-216, March.
Handle:
RePEc:aza:jfc000:y:2020:v:3:i:3:p:208-216
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
- E5 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit
- K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:jfc000:y:2020:v:3:i:3:p:208-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.