Author
Listed:
- Tomanek, Stefan
(Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA), Otto-Wagner-Platz 5, Austria)
- Pekler, Florian
(Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA), Otto-Wagner-Platz 5, Austria)
- Rirsch, Ralph
(Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA), Otto-Wagner-Platz 5, Austria)
Abstract
The success story of the crypto-economy is undeniable. Crypto has gradually been making headway into the traditional financial sector. Acceptance of and demand for distributed ledger technologies (DLT)-based securities are on the rise. ‘Initial token offerings’ (ITOs) or ‘security token offerings’ (STOs) are on the verge of entering the mainstream — especially in the realm of small and medium enterprise (SME) financing. The borderline between the traditional financial markets and the crypto-economy is starting to blur. The players in the financial markets, however, are not the only ones beginning to realise the potential of Blockchain, and, more generally, DLT. The public sector is also slowly waking up. Recent developments include new legislation in Liechtenstein, France and Germany, as well as various initiatives in other member states. Amid all this enthusiasm and optimism, there is one issue that undeniably still dampens the mood: current EU financial markets law poses significant, and in some cases insurmountable, obstacles to the integration of DLT-based assets into the traditional financial system. In this paper, we analyse what currently appears to be the most pressing of these issues. These are the strict and inflexible rules of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive/Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFID1/MiFIR2) regimes and the Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CSDR) in the area of post-trade securities settlement that do not do justice to the characteristics of DLT and that at present almost completely prohibit any organised trading in DLT-based securities.
Suggested Citation
Tomanek, Stefan & Pekler, Florian & Rirsch, Ralph, 2021.
"Regulatory obstacles to organised trading in security tokens,"
Journal of Digital Banking, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 5(3), pages 219-230, December.
Handle:
RePEc:aza:jdb000:y:2021:v:5:i:3:p:219-230
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
- E5 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:jdb000:y:2021:v:5:i:3:p:219-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.