Aesthetic Autonomy under Constraint in Wilde Whistler and the Wuming Art Group

"Art for art's sake" appears to separate aesthetic value from social purpose, yet its historical force depends on who can make art, judge it, and encounter it. This article compares Oscar Wilde and James McNeill Whistler with Beijing's Wuming, or No Name, painting group through historical interpretation, close reading, and visual analysis. It distinguishes three dimensions of autonomy: authority over artistic ends, the practical conditions of production and circulation, and the consequences of artistic activity for personal and communal life. Readings of Whistler's criticism and Wilde's dialogues are placed alongside Whistler's Falling Rocket, Li Shan's Snow Scene, Zhang Wei's Fusuijing Building, and the inscribed verso of Zhao Wenliang's August 18. The comparison reveals disagreement within Victorian aestheticism and shows how Wuming's ordinary subjects could sustain forms of association outside prescribed political representation. Selective engagement with Western reproductions and Chinese aesthetics complicates any account of either complete isolation or direct inheritance from Wilde and Whistler. The article argues for situated autonomy: agency in determining artistic purposes that remains materially dependent and historically consequential. This approach preserves the specificity of artistic form without treating every landscape as a coded statement or every claim of aesthetic self-determination as withdrawal from history, thereby offering a nuanced framework for understanding cross-cultural artistic development.