IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/axf/soapsa/v4y2026ip20-29.html

A Comparative Study of Settlement Patterns and Socio-political Organization in the Yellow River Basin and the Maya Lowlands

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xiangyi

Abstract

The Yellow River Basin and the Maya Lowlands represent two distinct yet influential ancient civilizations. While existing research has explored each region individually, there is a significant gap in comparative studies addressing how environmental factors, political organization, and religious structures shaped settlement patterns and governance. This study aims to fill this gap by providing a comparative analysis of these regions, focusing on key case studies, such as Anyang and Luoyang from the Yellow River Basin, and Tikal and Copán from the Maya Lowlands. Using a comparative historical analysis, qualitative research, and case study methodology, the study explores how environmental challenge, such as flooding in the Yellow River Basin and tropical conditions in the Maya Lowlands, shaped urban development and governance models. The findings reveal that the Yellow River Basin's centralized political structure contrasted with the decentralized city-states of the Maya Lowlands, and that both regions used religious practices to reinforce political authority. This study contributes to the broader understanding of ancient urbanism and governance, offering insights that can inform contemporary urban planning and resource management practices. It also proposes directions for future research, particularly in exploring the role of ecological factors in shaping social structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xiangyi, 2026. "A Comparative Study of Settlement Patterns and Socio-political Organization in the Yellow River Basin and the Maya Lowlands," Simen Owen Academic Proceedings Series, Scientific Open Access Publishing, vol. 4, pages 20-29.
  • Handle: RePEc:axf:soapsa:v:4:y:2026:i::p:20-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://soapubs.com/index.php/SOAPS/article/view/1764/1620
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:axf:soapsa:v:4:y:2026:i::p:20-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yuchi Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://soapubs.com/index.php/SOAPS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.