IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/axf/soapsa/v4y2026ip138-147.html

The Reconstruction of Project-Based Curriculum Guided by Core Literacy: Design and Effectiveness in Promoting Deep Learning in Students

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Siwei

Abstract

Global educational reforms increasingly prioritize core competencies, with Project-Based Learning (PBL) as a key strategy for fostering transferable, deeper learning. However, a gap remains between PBL advocacy and implementation, as projects are often seen as isolated tasks rather than integral to curriculum redesign for systemic competency development. Current research insufficiently examines how PBL can systematically serve as the core structure for curriculum reconstruction to foster core literacy and deep learning. The mechanisms and outcomes of this approach remain underexplored. This study used design-based research to implement the Core Literacy-Embedded Project Cycle (CLPC) model in an 8th-grade biology unit. A mixed-methods approach compared an intervention group (n=60) with a comparison group (n=60), using pre-post tests, scenario-based tasks, project analysis, classroom observations, and reflective journals. The reconstructed curriculum led to equivalent gains in foundational knowledge but significantly better performance in knowledge transfer and application for the intervention group. Qualitative data showed increases in metacognitive engagement, reasoning, and collaboration, alongside challenges in time allocation and teacher facilitation. This study provides the validated CLPC model, demonstrating that integrating core literacy and PBL promotes deep learning without sacrificing content mastery. It offers practical insights for educators and suggests future research into cross-disciplinary applications and long-term impact studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Siwei, 2026. "The Reconstruction of Project-Based Curriculum Guided by Core Literacy: Design and Effectiveness in Promoting Deep Learning in Students," Simen Owen Academic Proceedings Series, Scientific Open Access Publishing, vol. 4, pages 138-147.
  • Handle: RePEc:axf:soapsa:v:4:y:2026:i::p:138-147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://soapubs.com/index.php/SOAPS/article/view/1776/1632
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:axf:soapsa:v:4:y:2026:i::p:138-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yuchi Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://soapubs.com/index.php/SOAPS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.