IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/axf/ijehss/v3y2026i2p9-18.html

Artificial Intelligence and Teacher Feedback in Second Language Writing: A Comparative Review and Future Directions

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Jiaxin

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence, particularly large language models such as ChatGPT, has profoundly reshaped feedback practices in second language (L2) writing instruction. This paper presents a systematic and comprehensive review of contemporary research on AI-generated and teacher-provided feedback in L2 writing contexts, focusing on their respective functions, comparative effectiveness, and interactive relationships. The review clarifies three core thematic areas: the complementary value of dual feedback modes, student engagement with AI-mediated feedback, and optimized prompt design for AI-based writing tools. Findings indicate that AI feedback demonstrates notable advantages over traditional teacher feedback in terms of efficiency, coverage, and capacity for positive reinforcement. However, teacher feedback remains indispensable for delivering personalized guidance, addressing nuanced rhetorical issues, and fostering learner self-regulation and agency. Drawing on these insights, this paper advocates for a hybrid AI-teacher feedback framework that strategically integrates the strengths of both modalities to maximize instructional outcomes. Furthermore, the review identifies critical gaps in the existing literature and proposes several promising future research directions, including learner-centered perspectives, diversified feedback modalities encompassing multimodal and peer-assisted approaches, and the adoption of mixed-methods research designs. By bridging theoretical foundations with practical implications, this review aims to inform educators, researchers, and policymakers about the evolving landscape of feedback in L2 writing and to guide the development of more effective, equitable, and technologically informed pedagogical practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Jiaxin, 2026. "Artificial Intelligence and Teacher Feedback in Second Language Writing: A Comparative Review and Future Directions," International Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, Scientific Open Access Publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 9-18.
  • Handle: RePEc:axf:ijehss:v:3:y:2026:i:2:p:9-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://soapubs.com/index.php/IJEHSS/article/view/2447/2232
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:axf:ijehss:v:3:y:2026:i:2:p:9-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yuchi Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://soapubs.com/index.php/IJEHSS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.