IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/axf/ijehss/v3y2026i1p65-71.html

Is the US Economy Harmed by Cheap Imports from China?

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Xinyue

Abstract

This paper systematically evaluates the impact of low-cost Chinese imports on the United States economy, analyzing the complex relationship between aggregate national welfare and localized distributional consequences. Utilizing the foundational principles of welfare economics, the study comprehensively examines how the influx of affordable consumer goods over the past three decades has affected various segments of the U.S. market. The detailed analysis reveals that these imports have generated substantial net aggregate gains by significantly expanding consumer surplus, increasing real purchasing power, and lowering the overall cost of living for the general population. These economic benefits have been particularly impactful for lower-income American households, who typically allocate a disproportionate share of their household budgets to tradable goods. However, the study also acknowledges that these broad consumer advantages are counterbalanced by highly concentrated producer losses in specific sectors. The rapid expansion of Chinese manufacturing triggered the well-documented "China Shock," which significantly impacted deindustrialized communities, intensified employment market competition, and caused notable manufacturing job transitions. The paper concludes that while affordable Chinese imports do not inflict net harm on the U.S. economy as a whole, they create profound distributional imbalances and strategic economic challenges. Consequently, rather than relying on blunt protectionist measures, effective economic policy must focus on targeted domestic measures to support displaced workers and mitigate regional inequalities, thereby successfully balancing aggregate prosperity with long-term social equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Xinyue, 2026. "Is the US Economy Harmed by Cheap Imports from China?," International Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, Scientific Open Access Publishing, vol. 3(1), pages 65-71.
  • Handle: RePEc:axf:ijehss:v:3:y:2026:i:1:p:65-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://soapubs.com/index.php/IJEHSS/article/view/2355/2159
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:axf:ijehss:v:3:y:2026:i:1:p:65-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yuchi Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://soapubs.com/index.php/IJEHSS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.