IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/axf/gbppsa/v19y2026ip21-28.html

Quantifying Pan-Map Information Content: A Multi-Factor Weighting Model

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao, Tianying
  • Qi, Xiudong

Abstract

This study introduces a multi-factor, cognition-weighted model designed to quantitatively evaluate map information content in response to the growing diversity of pan-map representations. Drawing on cartographic-cognition theory, map elements are initially grouped into three overarching categories-text, graphics, and boundaries-and are subsequently subdivided into eight distinct types, each assigned a specific cognitive weight reflecting its relative contribution to information perception. The total information content (I) of a map is calculated by multiplying the number of elements in each category by their respective cognitive weights and summing the resulting products, while normalized information entropy (H_norm) is used to assess the distribution balance across categories, indicating the degree of evenness in information presentation. A total of fifteen representative maps of Chengdu, including standard, thematic, electronic, and hand-drawn varieties, were analyzed within a standardized 800 × 800 pixels framework to ensure comparability. The analysis reveals that standard maps exhibit the highest values of I and H_norm, suggesting a dense yet well-organized information structure that supports efficient comprehension; hand-drawn maps display highly variable values, reflecting the individualized and flexible nature of manual cartographic design; electronic maps tend to regulate information density dynamically through scale adjustments, resulting in clustering at moderate-to-high levels; thematic maps, which prioritize specific types of knowledge, generally carry lower overall information content and exhibit uneven category distribution. These findings highlight that map information content, when quantified using cognition-weighted approaches, not only captures the volume of information but also provides insights into the structural balance and readability of diverse map forms, offering a practical metric for evaluating map quality and guiding future cartographic design.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao, Tianying & Qi, Xiudong, 2026. "Quantifying Pan-Map Information Content: A Multi-Factor Weighting Model," GBP Proceedings Series, Scientific Open Access Publishing, vol. 19, pages 21-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:axf:gbppsa:v:19:y:2026:i::p:21-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://soapubs.com/index.php/GBPPS/article/view/1322/1206
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:axf:gbppsa:v:19:y:2026:i::p:21-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yuchi Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://soapubs.com/index.php/GBPPS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.