IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/axf/gbppsa/v10y2025ip140-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study on the Syntactic Complexity of College English Writing between Chinese EFL Learners and Native English Speakers

Author

Listed:
  • He, Houjiang

Abstract

In this study, a corpus was constructed based on students' English compositions from a regional college (TEST), with additional data selected from the TECCL, WECCL, and LOCNESS corpora, in attempting to compare syntactic complexity among English learners in Chinese universities and that between Chinese EFL learners and native speakers. The results showed that there was significant difference in the syntactic complexity of English writing among Chinese undergraduates, and in particular, the syntactic complexity of students from the regional college was significantly higher than their counterparts in other schools, even when the former students were thought to be less proficient in English abilities than the latter. However, there were significant differences in the values of syntactic complexity indicators between Chinese EFL learners and native speakers, with the exception of only three indicators, namely Mean length of clause (MLC), Number of T-units per sentence (T/S) and Number of complex nominals per T-unit (CN/T). In addition, further analysis on the example sentences proved that the accuracy of a few indicators of syntactic complexity was affected by the writers' competence in syntax, in hope that refined T-unit indicator, in particular, should be explored.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Houjiang, 2025. "A Comparative Study on the Syntactic Complexity of College English Writing between Chinese EFL Learners and Native English Speakers," GBP Proceedings Series, Scientific Open Access Publishing, vol. 10, pages 140-148.
  • Handle: RePEc:axf:gbppsa:v:10:y:2025:i::p:140-148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://soapubs.com/index.php/GBPPS/article/view/693/679
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:axf:gbppsa:v:10:y:2025:i::p:140-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yuchi Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://soapubs.com/index.php/GBPPS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.