IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/axf/eiaaaa/v2y2025i9p328-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Empirical Study on GAI-Enabled POA and Traditional POA Teaching Modes: A Case Study of College English Writing

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Jingbo

Abstract

This study focuses on the differences in the effectiveness of GAI-enabled POA and traditional POA teaching modes in college English writing teaching, and conducts an empirical analysis through a quasi-experimental design. Eighty-two undergraduate students were selected as the research subjects and randomly divided into an experimental group (GAI-enabled POA mode) and a control group (traditional POA mode) for a 16-week teaching experiment. The research tools included writing test papers, the Learning Motivation Scale, the Independent Learning Ability Questionnaire, and interviews, which were quantitatively analyzed using SPSS 26.0 and qualitatively analyzed using NVivo 12. The results showed that: (1) the experimental group's total writing scores and scores on content, structure, and language subscales were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.001), and the improvement was more obvious for middle and low level students; (2) the experimental group's scores on motivation for learning and independent learning ability were significantly better than those of the control group (P<0.001); (3) the teachers and students are more receptive to the GAI-enabled POA model, but there is a risk of overdependence. The study confirms that GAI can effectively improve the effect of writing teaching by optimising the POA mode, which provides practical reference for the reform of university English writing teaching.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Jingbo, 2025. "Comparative Empirical Study on GAI-Enabled POA and Traditional POA Teaching Modes: A Case Study of College English Writing," Education Insights, Scientific Open Access Publishing, vol. 2(9), pages 328-334.
    • Handle: RePEc:axf:eiaaaa:v:2:y:2025:i:9:p:328-334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://soapubs.com/index.php/EI/article/view/734/719
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:axf:eiaaaa:v:2:y:2025:i:9:p:328-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yuchi Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://soapubs.com/index.php/EI .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.