IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/axf/eiaaaa/v2y2025i11p24-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Cognitive Mechanism of Medical English Metaphor and Its Adaptability in Cross-Cultural Communication

Author

Listed:
  • Han, Chenyu

Abstract

This study examines the cognitive mechanisms underlying the use of metaphors in medical English, emphasizing their crucial role in both conceptual development and precise linguistic expression. Metaphors serve not merely as rhetorical devices but as cognitive tools that structure complex medical concepts, facilitate reasoning, and enhance memorability. The research explores how these metaphors adapt across different cultural and linguistic contexts, highlighting the influence of cultural background, prior knowledge, and linguistic norms on metaphor comprehension and usage. Through detailed analysis of representative examples, it investigates patterns of semantic mapping, conceptual framing, and cross-linguistic equivalence, revealing how cultural nuances can both facilitate and hinder effective communication. The study further identifies common challenges in translating and conveying medical metaphors to audiences with diverse cultural frameworks, proposing targeted adaptation strategies to enhance clarity, retention, and engagement. By integrating theoretical perspectives from cognitive linguistics with practical applications in medical communication, this research provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the interplay between metaphorical thinking, language, and culture, ultimately offering valuable guidance for promoting effective cross-cultural knowledge transfer and improving professional communication in global healthcare contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Han, Chenyu, 2025. "Study on the Cognitive Mechanism of Medical English Metaphor and Its Adaptability in Cross-Cultural Communication," Education Insights, Scientific Open Access Publishing, vol. 2(11), pages 24-30.
  • Handle: RePEc:axf:eiaaaa:v:2:y:2025:i:11:p:24-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://soapubs.com/index.php/EI/article/view/839/818
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:axf:eiaaaa:v:2:y:2025:i:11:p:24-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yuchi Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://soapubs.com/index.php/EI .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.