IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/awd/acectu/v4y2018i1p63-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU Fund's Assets in the Function of Rural Tourism Development in Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Mato Bartoluci

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Zrinka Starešinić
  • Duška Mia Franić
  • Filip Bartoluci

Abstract

Rural tourism in the Republic of Croatia as a special type of tourism was operating and organized in the nineties of the last century. Since then, the number of registered tourist farm families at the state level is constantly in a slow, but upward trend. In the total revenue from tourism in Croatia, rural tourism is only 1% of revenue. It is estimated that rural tourism, including mountain areas, participates in total international travels with a share of about 3%, with annual growth of about 6%. Faced with underdeveloped domestic demand and inadequate environment, Croatian tourism offerings are developing extremely slowly. The only exception is Istria, and, to a certain extent, the Osijek Baranja County”1 This is far below the opportunities that exist in rural tourism, given that in the Republic of Croatia there is predominantly rural space, which accounts for about 93% of the total area. Rural tourism is defined by the natural and cultural resources in the rural area, and these resources represent the basic basis for further rural development. It is considered that rural tourism is one of the most promising complementary economic activities in Croatia and that its sustainable development needs to be continuously and planned. By joining the European Union, Croatia has opened up the possibility of funding various areas and projects from European structural and investment funds, and thus financing rural tourism. In the pre-accession period, an IPARD program was available. By joining the full EU membership, the EU Rural Development Program gets new opportunities with a total allocation of EUR 2.383 billion for the Republic of Croatia. Taking into account the contracted investments and the amounts paid out of the IPARD program as well as Measures 6 and 7 of the Rural Development Program, the largest absorption of funds is recorded by the Istarska County, then Osijek Baranja and Dubrovačko Neretvanska Canton. Although the trend of “withdrawal” of funds from EU funds is increasing, additional efforts should be made to finally use rural tourism systematically to revitalize the peripheral and less developed rural areas of Croatia. In line with Croatia’s Tourism Development Strategy 2013 - 2020, the dynamic development of Croatia’s rural tourism will be the result of a stimulating business climate, responsible destination management and a high level of involvement and dedication of all tourism policy holders at the national and regional level. In order to achieve these strategic goals, it is necessary to first and foremost intensify the implementation of major strategic projects with a special emphasis on capital investment. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to analyze the role of EU funds in the development of rural tourism in the Republic of Croatia. Certain scientific methods have been used in this paper: desk research for collecting secondary data sources, methods of analysis and synthesis, and methods of comparative analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Mato Bartoluci & Zrinka Starešinić & Duška Mia Franić & Filip Bartoluci, 2018. "EU Fund's Assets in the Function of Rural Tourism Development in Croatia," Acta Economica Et Turistica, Libertas International University, vol. 4(1), pages 63-78, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:awd:acectu:v:4:y:2018:i:1:p:63-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/296320
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeljka Mesic & Viktorija Primorac & Marija Cerjak, 2022. "Push Travel Motivations As A Basis For Segmentation Of Tourists In Emerging Rural Tourism Destinations: The Case Of Croatia," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 31(1), pages 303-325, june.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:awd:acectu:v:4:y:2018:i:1:p:63-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mario Pallua (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.libertas.hr/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.