IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aud/audfin/v14y2016i140p868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate qualitative and quantitative assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Maria – Monica Haralambie

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Bogdan ?tefan Ionescu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

Until a few decades ago, the decision power to deny or grant a loan laid in the hands of a single individual: the credit analyst. Some of the bad experiences of banks losses or even failures were attributed to bad decisions made by credit analysts, who based their decision on personal knowledge, their information about the potential customer and the trust placed in the customer. After the financial crisis, two key concerns have been raised regarding banks’ activities: “too little, too late” provisioning for loan losses and “too big to fail”. The credit risk management subject became not only a compliance exercise for banks, but also a key item considered when establishing the strategy and execution path. Our intention within this paper is to discuss some of the specific issues related to credit risk management, considered by commercial banks when analysing a corporate client. The result of this research is a web application named CISS (Credit Institution Scoring System), which represents a proof of concept for a bank credit scoring system. The application was developed using HTML + MySQL + PHP solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria – Monica Haralambie & Bogdan ?tefan Ionescu, 2016. "Corporate qualitative and quantitative assessment," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(140), pages 868-868, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:14:y:2016:i:140:p:868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_9491.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Credit risk; scoring; multidimensional model; database; application; corporate clients.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:14:y:2016:i:140:p:868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dumitru Valentin Florentin (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://revista.cafr.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.