IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ath/journl/v50y2018i2p44-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

About public acquisition monitoring role and necessity during framework agreement post-implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Liliana MANEA

    (Athenaeum University, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This article aims to highlight the importance of a good contract administration to the success of the public contracting process. The necessity for monitoring is also crucial, because during the implementation and post-implementation stage a significant amount of waste and abuse of public funds and corruption in public contracting happens. Our research considers that, most of the focus monitoring and control time is placed on the procurement process, which is a comparatively shorter period than contract implementation. In our opinion, the real benefits, however, are obtained after the contract is awarded, so more attention needs to be placed on ensuring the contract is implemented consistently with its terms and conditions. This is not to lessen the importance of the procurement process in getting the contract awarded, but it is only after the contract is awarded that the real value of the entire procurement process is achieved. Therefore, our article presents a risks analysis of the post-implementation process and aims to spotlight an issue for Romanian present stage of public acquisition process.

Suggested Citation

  • Liliana MANEA, 2018. "About public acquisition monitoring role and necessity during framework agreement post-implementation," Internal Auditing and Risk Management, Athenaeum University of Bucharest, vol. 50(2), pages 44-54, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ath:journl:v:50:y:2018:i:2:p:44-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://aimr.univath.ro/download/1147_IARM-50-4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://aimr.univath.ro/en/article/About-public-acquisition-monitoring-role-and-necessity-during-framework-agreement-post-implementation~1147.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public aquisition; risk analysis; procurement process; monitoring necessity; public funds; corruption in public contracts;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ath:journl:v:50:y:2018:i:2:p:44-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cosmin Catalin Olteanu and Emilia Vasile (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feathro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.