IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v8y2018i1p163-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some considerations about the application of the more favourable criminal law regarding deeds on trial in some countries of European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Raisa Roscan

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to realize a study regarding the comparison of the penal provisions that uphold the application of the more favorable criminal law until the final judgment of the cause between Romania and France, Italy, Spain and Portugal. The study is realized as result of a doctrine, jurisprudential and legal analysis from all the five countries, and the author is proposing to identify not only the similarities but also the differences of applying the more favorable criminal law until final judgment of the cause in Romania and another four European countries. We will identify the definitions of the more favorable law, legal regulations, conditions of application, special application situations, application limits. Special attentions will be paid to the concept de lex tertia, because we need to establish if one of these countries applies the more favorable criminal law on autonomous institutions, meaning if there can be a combination of more legal provision from two or more consecutive penal laws. We will see if Romania rallied to the penal policy of the other European countries but also what do they bring new to the matter.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Raisa Roscan, 2018. "Some considerations about the application of the more favourable criminal law regarding deeds on trial in some countries of European Union," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 8(1), pages 163-178, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:163-178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An8v1/14.%20Roscan%20Alexandra%20Raisa.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    the more favourable criminal law; lex tertia; non-retroactivity; retroactivity.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:163-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.