IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v7y2017ispecialp224-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recognition and enforcement of the European protection order in the Romanian law. Some critical opinions. De lege ferenda proposals

Author

Listed:
  • Ion Rusu

    (“Danubius” University in Galati, lawyer - Vrancea Bar)

Abstract

The current study examines the provisions of Law no. 151/2016 regarding the competences and concrete actions of the Romanian judicial authorities for the recognition and enforcement of a European protection order, sent for execution by a competent authority of another Member State. The novelty is the conducted examination, the critical opinions and de lege ferenda proposals. The paper is a continuation of other papers that relate to the complex activity of international judicial cooperation in criminal matters and the involvement of the Romanian legislator in transposing into the national law of the European legal instruments in the field. Given its structure and the way in which it has been designed, the paper can be useful to academics, practitioners in the field and to the Romanian legislator in terms of completion and modification of the legislative act under examination.

Suggested Citation

  • Ion Rusu, 2017. "Recognition and enforcement of the European protection order in the Romanian law. Some critical opinions. De lege ferenda proposals," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 7(Special), pages 224-235, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:7:y:2017:i:special:p:224-235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An7v11/16.%20Rusu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    the competent Romanian authorities; recognition procedure; reasons for rejecting the request; the duration of the measure.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:7:y:2017:i:special:p:224-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.