IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v7y2017i1p179-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The enforcement of investigative measures based on the European investigation order in criminal matters. Comparative examination relating to the Romanian law. Critical opinions and de lege ferenda proposals

Author

Listed:
  • Ion Rusu

    (“Danubius” University of Galati, lawyer, Vrancea Bar, Romania)

Abstract

In the present study we have examined the specific provisions for certain investigative measures that may be subject to a European investigation warrant in criminal matters provided for in Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 3, 2014 on the European criminal investigation order. Thus, we have examined each investigative measures provided in the European legal instrument through the national legislation of Romania, as in the terms of transposition of this legislative act into the Romanian law. The examination of the European legislative act allowed us to identify some dysfunctions in the settlement of some provisions, malfunctions which in the judicial practice of Member States’ competent institutions will cause numerous problems, both of interpretation and application. Among these we only highlight the lack of concrete provisions that oblige the judicial authorities of the countries involved in the issuance and execution of a European investigation order in criminal matters, to provide legal assistance to the persons who are conducting such procedures. In this context, we have formulated a series of critical opinions, complemented by appropriate de lege ferenda proposals, which may be useful to the European legislator from the perspective of amending and supplementing this legislative act. We have also stressed on the need of transposing the European legislative act into the Romanian law by adopting a special law and not by amending some provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. The innovations in the paper refer to the examination of the investigative measures that can be arranged by issuing a European investigation order in criminal matters, formulating some critical opinions and appropriate de lege ferenda proposals. The paper can be useful to the academics, practitioners in the field, especially to the European legislator from the perspective of amending and supplementing the European legal instrument and also to the Romanian legislator that will have to transpose this legislative act into the national law.

Suggested Citation

  • Ion Rusu, 2017. "The enforcement of investigative measures based on the European investigation order in criminal matters. Comparative examination relating to the Romanian law. Critical opinions and de lege ferenda pro," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 7(1), pages 179-197, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:7:y:2017:i:1:p:179-197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An7v1/15%20Ion%20Rusu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ioana-Minodora Rusu, 2016. "Issuance And Transmission Of The European Protection Order In The European Union. Critical Opinions. De Lege Ferenda Proposals," Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 5(1), pages 214-219, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      investigative measures; crime; cooperation; European Union member states.;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law
      • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:7:y:2017:i:1:p:179-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.