IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v6y2016ispecialp77-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The enforcement of fines and forfeiture measures ordered by the International Criminal Court: the critical role of States

Author

Listed:
  • Etienne Kentsa

    (PhD candidate at the University of Douala, Cameroon, Assistant Lecturer at the Faculty of Social and Management Sciences (Department of Law), University of Buea, Cameroon)

Abstract

This paper aims at analyzing the legal regime for the enforcement of fines and forfeiture measures as provided by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC). The institution of this category of penalties and measures is unprecedented in international criminal law and has as major ambition of ensuring reparations for victims. The success of the restorative justice system under the Statute is dependent on the efficiency of the enforcement of fines and forfeitures ordered by the Court. Such success is actually based on domestic legal systems. Analysis of enforcement mechanisms of fines and forfeitures shows that the assistance of State authorities is vital in the enforcement of ICC decisions. To ensure effective enforcement of fines and forfeiture, the Statute enshrines the application of national legislation; which implicitly requires States Parties otherwise to adopt appropriate legislation, at least to undertake the adaptation of existing legislation. The satisfaction of this substantial requirement enables the States Parties to serenely execute their major obligations in this area (the obligation to give effect to fines or forfeitures ordered by the Court and the obligation to protect the rights of bona fide third parties).

Suggested Citation

  • Etienne Kentsa, 2016. "The enforcement of fines and forfeiture measures ordered by the International Criminal Court: the critical role of States," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 6(Special), pages 77-98, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:6:y:2016:i:special:p:77-98
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An6v2/4%20Kentsa.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fine; forfeiture; forfeiture order; lex fori; Enforcement measures; cooperation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:6:y:2016:i:special:p:77-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.