IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v6y2016i1p137-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the European Union. Comparative examination. Critical opinions

Author

Listed:
  • Bogdan Bîrzu

    („Titu Maiorescu” University of Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

In the present study we have examined the Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and the Council, the European legal instrument governing the right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the European Union. The innovations in this paper concern the examination of the regulatory way of the mentioned two rights, the formulated critical opinions and the proposals of de lege ferenda. The value of the paper lies in the de lege ferenda proposals, which that can contribute to improving the system of European legislation in the field, which in the constant interpretation of the ECHR it also requires respecting the right to interpretation and translation in ongoing criminal proceedings. Also, the examination highlights the importance and necessity of adopting this European legal instrument regarding the harmonization of the national laws in terms of compulsoriness and the procedure for complying with the two rights to which we referred, in case where the suspect or the accused is to be judged of the territory of a Member State other than his State of origin. The work can be useful to theorists, practitioners and to the European legislator from the perspective of operating the suggested changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Bogdan Bîrzu, 2016. "The right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the European Union. Comparative examination. Critical opinions," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 6(1), pages 137-147, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:6:y:2016:i:1:p:137-147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An6v1/10%20Birzu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    suspect; accused; offense; criminal proceedings; the right to a fair trial.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:6:y:2016:i:1:p:137-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.