IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v2y2012i2p133-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The punishment’s purpose

Author

Listed:
  • Gheorghe Diaconu

    (Faculty of Juridical and Administrative Sciences, the Law Department, University of Pitesti, Romania)

Abstract

The repressive reaction involves, as any human action, a certain finality. As the punishment's essence is the suffering, then, in the course of time it has been arisen the question regarding the goal for which the society utilizes the suffering and for what the society punishes. According to the classic penal doctrine that bases on the idea of retribution, the repressive reaction was limited to a simple revenge and it didn't existed any concern in order to influence the doer's future behaviour. In the positivist conception, the punishment's purpose was to shelter the society against the offender's new attacks. Going up to an extreme point with this idea, the positivists equated the punishment with the curative treatment at which the patients in the hospitals were submitted and which it was adequate to each category of offender. For the positivists, the penal sanction, it was meant to combat the organic or the psychological anomalies or the dysfunctions of the social environment that have influenced the offender and that determined him to commit antisocial deeds. In the modern vision, the punishment cannot have a goal on its own and that is to answer to bad with bad because it doesn't come from an abstract desire for revenge, but from a concrete necessity of hindering the repetition of the antisocial deeds and of defending the fundamental social values.

Suggested Citation

  • Gheorghe Diaconu, 2012. "The punishment’s purpose," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 2(2), pages 133-138, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:2:y:2012:i:2:p:133-138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An2v2/art11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    the punishment’s purpose; the classic penal doctrine; retributive character; prevention; suffering; positivist vision;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:2:y:2012:i:2:p:133-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.