IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v12y2022i4p443-456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The advisory role of international courts in the evolution of human rights law

Author

Listed:
  • Fátima Castro MOREIRA

    (Portucalense University, IJP-Portucalense Institute for Legal Research, Portugal)

Abstract

Human rights have the pedigree of a distinguished struggle against oppression: everyone shall be treated with respect for their inherent dignity and human worth.3 The horrors of the Second World War provided the legal basis for the modern human rights law. The establishment of the United Nations (UN) signalled the beginning of an international concern for the protection of human rights. Human rights transnational institutions have developed human rights principles, some recognized as jus cogens norms. Nonetheless the application of human rights law in courts is almost always contested. The functions of international courts such as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) are dependant on the States volition and the settlement of disputes between them. Whenever asked by the UN organs and specialized agencies, international courts also give advisory opinions on contentious legal questions. The impact of international jurisprudence on contemporary international law is significant, assessing key areas of international law, such as law of the sea, international environment law and international human rights law. Note that, in this paper we focus on the particular impact of the advisory opinions on the human rights law.

Suggested Citation

  • Fátima Castro MOREIRA, 2022. "The advisory role of international courts in the evolution of human rights law," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 12(4), pages 443-456, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:443-456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An12v4/1.%20Castro%20Moreira.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    human rights; International Court of Justice; international courts; advisory opinions.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law
    • K38 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Human Rights Law; Gender Law; Animal Rights Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:443-456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.