IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/joasrj/v4y2014i11p690-703id3693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critizm Rationale of A. Hassan Bangil in Validity on Hadith

Author

Listed:
  • Zainuddin MZ

Abstract

During the time, hadiths are always subordinated position, so that when the its-dzahir contrary with Al-Qur’an, then the reasonable (hujjah) of this hadith immediately aborted.Consequently, not a few hadiths which have been graded authentic by the scholars (shahih) should be impeached (can not be used as proof/ hujjah). The real, shahih hadith has not contradicted to the Qur'an, hadith is explanatory of the Qur'an. However, interpreting of hadith is not easy. There are differences among ulama of hadith which is caused by the differences of manhaj (mindset). A. Hasan Bangil or A.Hasan, that his rationale is adopted by most of ulama in Indonesia offers some criterions, when a hadith can be used as hujjah (reasonable for adjustment) or not. However, author does not agree with some hadiths which is determined dhaif by A. Hassan. Therefore, in this paper, author tries to explain: First, his biography especially with his background relating to get knowledge. Second, how manhaj is used in determining the degree of validation of hadith. Third, how his rationale can be criticized so seem positive and negative sides and some example hadiths where a contradiction is happen. This paper aims to contribute academically about how ulama determine the degree of validation of hadith, and can be used as a reference for those researchers who active researching on the validity of hadiths.

Suggested Citation

  • Zainuddin MZ, 2014. "Critizm Rationale of A. Hassan Bangil in Validity on Hadith," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(11), pages 690-703.
    • Handle: RePEc:asi:joasrj:v:4:y:2014:i:11:p:690-703:id:3693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5003/article/view/3693/5850
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:joasrj:v:4:y:2014:i:11:p:690-703:id:3693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5003/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.