IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/joasrj/v3y2013i6p654-669id3520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Processing and Characterisation of Various Polymer Blends to Develop Implant for Tissue Engineering Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Elaine Kenny
  • Declan Devine
  • Clement Higginbotham
  • Luke Geever

Abstract

In the past two decades, the repair and reconstruction of musculoskeletal tissues using biodegradable scaffold materials has emerged as one of the most promising approaches in tissue engineering. The aim of this study is to process, via hot melt extrusion, the biodegradable and biocompatible polymeric materials; poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), ⍺-lactose monohydrate and poly(e-caprolactone) (PCL), and investigate their suitability in tissue regenerating applications. Concentrations of the polymer blends were varied in order to optimise the degradation rate of the matrix blend. The effect of extrusion and plasticiser on the thermal and melt viscosity properties of the blends was coincidentally monitored. Materials of both pellet and powder compositions were compared in order to determine which composition provided optimum results. Blends were characterised using melt flow index (MFI), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), rheometry and degradation analysis. Addition of plasticiser was found to cause a decrease in viscosity and melt temperature of the materials, so too was the extrusion process albeit to a lesser extent, while addition of filler increased melt viscosity and melt temperature of the blend. A vital advantage of this study is the ability to fine tune the properties of the matrix by varying material concentrations, making these promising candidates for tissue engineering applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Elaine Kenny & Declan Devine & Clement Higginbotham & Luke Geever, 2013. "Processing and Characterisation of Various Polymer Blends to Develop Implant for Tissue Engineering Applications," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(6), pages 654-669.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:joasrj:v:3:y:2013:i:6:p:654-669:id:3520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5003/article/view/3520/5595
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:joasrj:v:3:y:2013:i:6:p:654-669:id:3520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5003/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.