IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/joasrj/v3y2013i12p1128-1137id3577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of the Mechanical Behavior and Corrosion of Alloys Commonly Used in Orthodontic Applications with New Alloy Free Nickel

Author

Listed:
  • João Roberto Sartori Moreno
  • Juliete N Pereira
  • Neide Aparecida Mariano

Abstract

This work is characterized by a comparative study of mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of alloys in common use and under consideration in orthodontics. The study is being conducted in three types of alloys, stainless steel 304V, Ni-Ti alloy which are the most common, and Ni-Free alloy Böhler latest, in order to compare their behavior with mechanical tension stress intraoral and corrosion in environment chloride and artificial salivating of pH 5.99. The corrosion tests were performed prior to ASTM F 2129-08, ASTM B117-07 and beginning all the alloys did not show any sign of general corrosion in chloride solution via Salt Spray, but different strength, especially the alloy Böhler-Free Ni austenite which is presented in value much higher in comparison with the other. However, the electrochemical behavior by test EPR-DL (Electrochemical Potentiodynamic Reactivation - Double Loop) has still been somewhat similar, with the pitting critical potential indefinite absence of hysteresis during the scan potential in descending order, showing an absence of marked growth of density current. Also, the estimate of the forces involved during orthodontic correction, phase alignment and leveling, it was a finite element simulation of the activation of the teeth that showed lower levels of stress for the alloy NiTi than for stainless steel 304 V and Free-Ni alloy.

Suggested Citation

  • João Roberto Sartori Moreno & Juliete N Pereira & Neide Aparecida Mariano, 2013. "Comparative Study of the Mechanical Behavior and Corrosion of Alloys Commonly Used in Orthodontic Applications with New Alloy Free Nickel," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(12), pages 1128-1137.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:joasrj:v:3:y:2013:i:12:p:1128-1137:id:3577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5003/article/view/3577/5671
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:joasrj:v:3:y:2013:i:12:p:1128-1137:id:3577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5003/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.